Test how people react —
before you launch.
We don't ask chatbots for an opinion. We construct and validate psychological roles — the audiences you can't easily reach, or can't ethically test on — and run the studies that surface confusion, distrust, resistance and risk, so you can fix the mismatch before it goes live.
The people who matter are
the hardest to test on.
High-stakes communication fails with the audiences you can least afford to get wrong — and those are exactly the people a real study can't reach in time, or shouldn't reach at all.
So we build them. Validated synthetic audiences you can interview, message-test, and stress-test — before a single real person sees what you launch.
Example projects
we've done.
What can be
tested.
We simulate the people who matter, run the tasks that reveal misunderstanding, distrust, resistance, misuse, or poor collaboration, and help fix the mismatch before launch.
The same apparatus applies across communication, digital products, AI systems and the points where people and machines meet.
Built on experimental psychology,
not prompt engineering.
We don't generate personas by writing longer system prompts. We separate creation, simulation, and evaluation across independent models — eliminating preference leakage. We validate against national survey data. We run hundreds of iterations per condition and analyze distributions, not cherry-picked outputs.
Our finding: newer, more capable models are often more sensitive to minor perturbations. A name change shifts scores. A formatting tweak alters reasoning. Single-shot evaluation hides this. We don't do single-shot evaluation.
Two ways to
work with us.
Tell us what you're building.
We'll tell you what breaks.
Send us the message, product or system you want to examine — a project, a recurring testing workflow, or a behavioural audit of your production AI. No discovery decks. No six-week procurement waltz.
hello@impersonato.com ↗